Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

What is the meaning of xenophobe?

What is the meaning of xenophobe?

Society

Life, in its essence, often presents itself as a two-sided coin, compelling individuals to weigh both pros and cons before arriving at a reasoned judgment. The notion of travel, particularly in the context of fostering understanding and combating xenophobia, provides a pertinent example of such a dichotomy. Andrew Solomon promotes the broad and enriching effects of travel, proposing it as a remedy for global misunderstandings and fears. On the contrary, Agnes Callard, in “The Case Against Travel,” posits a more critical view, arguing that travel is often self-serving and ineffectual in achieving genuine cultural engagement. After considering both perspectives, my analysis aligns more closely with Solomon’s advocacy for the benefits of travel, particularly focusing on the aspects of enhanced global awareness and interpersonal growth.

Andrew Solomon champions the transformative power of travel to combat xenophobia through personal and societal enlightenment. He argues that travel exposes individuals to diverse cultures and lifestyles, thereby fostering empathy and understanding. Solomon notes, “Travel is not merely a luxury… but a moral imperative for those who have the means for it” (Solomon, 2016). This statement underscores his belief that engaging with the world directly is essential in dissolving the fears and prejudices that often arise from ignorance. For example, Solomon’s own experiences, ranging from Moscow during the Soviet Union’s collapse to South Africa at the end of apartheid, illustrate how firsthand encounters with diverse peoples and places can challenge and expand one’s worldview, leading to a more informed and compassionate global perspective.

Moreover, Solomon articulates the concept that travel facilitates a deeper understanding of global dynamics and the varied human conditions, which can influence international policies and personal attitudes. He claims that other places serve as both a window and a mirror, not only unveiling their own character but also clarifying our understanding of our own culture. This reflection not only enhances personal growth but also contributes to a broader societal impact, where increased global awareness can lead to more effective and empathetic international relations. The claim that young adults living abroad could ease global diplomatic tensions highlights the belief in experiential learning’s power to promote peace and understanding.

Conversely, Agnes Callard provides a skeptical view of travel’s efficacy, suggesting that it often serves as a superficial engagement with the world, masked by the pretense of self-improvement and enlightenment. Callard critiques the notion that travel inherently leads to a broader perspective, stating, “Travel turns us into the worst version of ourselves while convincing us that we’re at our best” (Callard, 2023). She challenges the depth of the connections and understandings purportedly gained through travel, arguing that these experiences are often more about self-gratification than genuine cultural engagement. In Seoul, South Korea, tourists often rent traditional hanbok dresses to take photos at historic sites like Gyeongbokgung Palace. While this activity superficially connects them to Korean culture, it primarily serves as a chance for picturesque photos, lacking deep engagement with the hanbok’s cultural and historical significance. This trend reduces a rich cultural practice to just a novel photo opportunity.

In summation, while both authors present compelling arguments regarding the value and drawbacks of travel, Solomon’s perspective resonates more with a constructive global vision, where travel acts as a significant catalyst for personal and collective progress. His opinion that the most dangerous worldview belongs to those who have not seen the world underscores the essential role that exposure to diverse cultures. Addressing Callard’s valid concerns requires adopting a more conscious approach to travel, focusing on deep engagement rather than superficial experiences. By fostering this depth of interaction, travel can truly act as a formidable force in diminishing xenophobia and enhancing global peace.

Wonjun Hwang

What is the meaning of xenophobe?