The failure of the German fleet is not as complex a subject as one might suspect.
The German fleet in many historians minds never compared with that of the Allied nations.
Germany’s geographic position is a major hindrance to any ambitions she might have to be a sea power. To get to the world’s oceans, her ships have to pass through narrow waters around the British Isles, and if at war with Britain, that is not easy.
The German heavy cruiser Admiral Hipper was abandoned in dry dock at Kiel in May 1945. She had been extensively damaged by Allied bombing.
Although on paper the Admiral Hipper class were large and powerful at 18,000 tonnes with 8×8″ guns, they were not good ships, suffering from very temperamental, fragile high pressure steam plants that were in need of constant maintenance and frequently broke down.
They also suffered from numerous structural issues and required much remedial work over their lifespans.
The Prinz Eugen survived the war but achieved little during her service, the Blucher was sunk by a Norwegian fort in 1940 and the Admiral Hipper was decommissioned in 1943 for repairs after being torpedoed and never re-entered service. So they were perhaps the least successful class of heavy cruisers to be built.
Should the Germans have concentrated on Aircraft Carriers?
It was unlikely that Carriers would have made much of a difference. If the carriers had operated in the Baltic or North Seas, they would have been subject to attack by land-based air power and unlikely to have lasted long. If they broke out into the Atlantic, they would probably have lasted as long as the Bismarck did.
The German fleet did not have any overseas bases or friendly ports to put into, Germany was badly hamstrung in any naval war with Britain, so her best recourse was a u-boat campaign against merchant shipping.
The Germans did not have a proper navy for much of the interwar period. They had a handful of obsolete coastal defense ships until the mid 30’s when Hitler began to build the Kriegsmarine. They didn’t have the same level of experience and expertise as other nations due to this gap in their naval history.
Germany really should have only built coastal defence ships and smaller types for the Baltic plus a few commerce raiders as she had no overseas possessions and with the British Isles in the way of getting out onto the world’s oceans, she was never going to be able to project sea power.
The Royal Navy was just too big.
The Bismarck might have sunk the Hood, but it’s the ships behind the Hood she had to worry about, so in the end, the Bismarck was a waste of manpower and resources.
The Royal Navy lost one ship but that meant almost nothing in the grand scheme of things as they could afford to lose ships, while Germany couldn’t. Behind the Hood was King George the Vth and the Rodney, but behind the Bismarck was pretty much nothing.
One could argue that the Tirpitz achieved far more than the Bismarck just by staying afloat and being a potential threat as she tied up Royal Navy resources for a significant period of time whereas the Bismarck was a threat for a few days after leaving home waters.
Germany’s World War 2 effort was a failure that opened up many learning possibilities for the Naval historian. The failure of the German fleet should be studied by generations.
Written by Ian Greenhalgh
Edited by Michael Pena & Alexander Fleiss
- Lockheed Martin Confirms the SR-72 – Son of Blackbird Will Reach Anywhere in the World in One Hour
- Flying an RF-4C Phantom vs Piloting Space Shuttle Discovery & Atlantis? NASA Astronaut Mike Mullane Answers the Question
- US Navy Nuclear Submarine USS Santa Fe Captain Talks Future Naval Strategy, Chinese Navy & Military History
- A Discussion on the Seven Years War with New York Times Bestselling Author Harlow Unger
- China’s New Stealth Fighter Jet: Imitation is the Greatest Form of Flattery
- Was Bismarck A Failure?
- American Hero & Living Legend General David Petraeus, Global Commander in Afghanistan & CIA Director Gives A Lesson on Leadership
- U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship Program
- Miniature Menace: The Threat of Weaponized Drone Use by Violent Non-state Actor
- In Defense of the Destroyer by US Navy Captain Tal Manvel
- National Security Institute Director Jamil N Jaffer on the Future of Warfare
- Russia’s New Arctic Missile System
- World’s Largest Aircraft Carrier Designer US Navy Captain Tal Manvel Opens Up
- The Future of US Submarines
- India, China, and Russia’s Military, an Inseparable Bond
- Military & Artificial Intelligence
- US Nuclear Submarine Captain David Marquet Opens Up
- Russia’s New Stealth Fighter Jet: Sukhoi Su-57
- China’s New Stealth Bomber
- How Does Big Data Show Up in War?
- Why Does Israel Dominate Cyber Security?
- Future War: Ai Runs Tanks
- TR-3B: Apologue, Alien, …or Air Force?
- Hypersonic Missiles : The Global Arms-Race of the Future?
- AI Makes Missile Technology Perform Better
- New Nuclear-Armed Stealth Submarine is the Future of the US Navy
- China Debuts Stealth Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle
- A Sit Down With Coast Guard Auxiliary Commodore Vincent Pica
- Should We Give Control of America’s Nukes to AI?
- Arms Race II
- The Modern Global Arms Race
- Space: The Final Frontier of Artificial Intelligence
- America’s Next Spy Plane
- 13 Questions With General David Petraeus
- Nuclear Submarines: A 7,000 Ton Swiss Watch
- Faster than Sound and Undetectable by Radar
- Ai to Power China’s Robotic Submarines