back to all

Revolut’s Stablecoin Is Failing

Revolut’s Stablecoin Is Failing – Exactly as I Predicted

Cryptocurrency & Blockchain

Revolut’s much-hyped Euro-backed stablecoin is stuck. Insiders are clear: regulators are killing the project.

Here’s why I called this failure months ago:

  1. Regulation is destroying profitability:
    The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework requires at least 60% of reserves to become held in low-risk assets, effectively banning interest payments to users. This destroys Revolut’s ability to generate meaningful returns from its stablecoin reserves.
  2. Market is completely saturated:
    The stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), which together control 80% of the $203 billion market. Euro-backed stablecoins, by contrast, represent a minuscule $252 million market. Revolut is attempting to enter a niche market with limited potential and fierce competition.
  3. No demand for retail use:
    Over 90% of stablecoin transactions become conducted by proprietary trading firms, hedge funds, and market makers for rebalancing liquidity. Retail payments make up a negligible fraction of transactions. Revolut’s decision to focus on retail use was a critical strategic misstep.

Revolut’s critical mistake? Building a stablecoin for retail use when real demand comes from traders moving capital quickly and efficiently.

Revolut Mexico CEO Sits Down With Rebellion Research

Tether and Circle dominate because they understand their market: serving professional liquidity providers. Revolut, on the other hand, is chasing retail dreams in a market that thrives on professional trading activity.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: stablecoins succeed by catering to the biggest players in the financial ecosystem—not retail users. Revolut’s stablecoin is failing because of its flawed strategy.

Do you think Revolut can pivot and recover, or is this another fintech flop?

Written by 2023 Top Crypto & Blockchain Minds‘ Anton Golub

More from Anton:

Recent Articles