Dispelling the Myth of the “Under Armored Battlecruiser HMS Hood”

Dispelling the Myth of the “Under Armored Battlecruiser HMS Hood”

Battleships / World War 2
Photographed in 1931-32, while fitted with an aircraft catapult aft.

For the Royal Navy HMS Hood was classified a battlecruiser. However many modern historians consider her a fast battleship that was much improved over anything such as the Queen Elizabeth-class battleships, Revenge class battleships and any other battleships afloat on her launch.

USS New Jersey Curator Ryan Szimanski told us:

“Hood was armored to the same level as contemporary battleships when she was built and should be known as a fast battleship not a battlecruiser.”
Ryan on USS New Jersey

On paper her level of protection was superior to anything afloat and she was significantly faster. Vice Admiral William Sims and other USN officers in Europe discussing with Admiral Henry T. Mayo, who was the head of the Atlantic Fleet spoke of the Hood also as a “fast battleship”. He also strongly pushed for the development of a similar class for the USN, but eventually the admiralty chose the lightly armoured Lexington-class battlecruiser class instead that was later cancelled.

On construction the main deck armour was added first, During Live-firing trials with the new 15-inch Armour Piercing shell against a mock-up showed her vitals possibly could’ve been penetrated through the 7-in middle belt. Therefore the designers asked to better protect the forward magazines with an extra 5-6 inch in July 1919 with the submerged torpedo tubes removed for compensation, and the aft torpedo-control tower was to be left with slightly thinner 25 mm walls which lately were not even needed. The anti-torpeo protection comprised a 7.5-foot (2.3 m) high torpedo bulge. It went for most of the side between barbettes, divided into an empty outer compartment, inner compartment with a series of water-tight “crushing tubes” and backed by a 1.5 in torpedo bulkhead very strong for any battleship.

The armored belt had face-hardened Krupp cemented armor, in three strakes.
Hood in 1924

The main one was 12 inches of 305 mm thick between the outermost barbettes, going down to just 5-6 inches or 127-152 mm on both ends. The middle armor belt was 7 inches or 178 mm thick. In addition, the upper belt was 5 in or 127 mm thick amidships starting from the ‘A’ barbette, and completed aft by a shorter 4-inch (102 mm) extension.

Hood (foreground) and Repulse (background) at anchor in Southern Australia during their world tour, 1924

With the armor on the gun turrets the gun turrets and their barbettes below were protected by 11-15 in or 279 to 381 mm, also with KC armor. Furthermore, the turret roofs were just over 5 inches thick. Decks were protected by high-tensile steel plates. With the forecastle deck 2.0 inch thick, the upper deck was 2 inch over the magazines and the main deck 3 inches over the magazines and over 1 inch in smaller places but with 2-inch slopes, meeting inside the bottom of the main belt. The lower deck was 3 inches thick, covering the propeller shafts, the other magazines 2 inch down with an extrac1 inch added in other places. This several folds were design to absorb the energy of a penetrating round causing it to explode prematurely being a great benefit to Hood’s armor.

The ship’s waterline belt was 12 inches thick.

Angled 12° outwards, protecting and allowing torpedo hits to vent to the atmosphere. The sloped belt was very close to the 330 mm that would be found in any ship classed as a super dreadnought and clearly way above any usual battlecruiser protection level. Superior to the latest battlecruisers like the Repulse. HMS Hood. The outer faces of ‘A’ and ‘Y’ barbettes were considerably thicker (below decks) than any other dreadnoughts. The conning tower (9-11 in) was record-thick for any  British capital ship. This tower itself weighed as much as 600 long tons alone, easily the weight of a destroyer.

The main fire-control director became protected by an armored Hood 6-3-2 inch and a 6-inch-thick communications tube ran to the main deck. The anti-torpedo bulges of the Admiral-class battlecruisers were also the first fitted and the most advanced in the world for ASW protection. In all the Hood was a more than capable ship for 1941, armed and armored to engage any ship, she had many significant refits in the 20s and 30s bringing her up to modern standards.

Truth is we will never know why she sank (there are several theories) but she was more than capable of engaging Bismarck and as proven was far from under armored.

USS New Jersey Curator Ryan Szimanski added: 

“Hood was every bit Bismarck’s equal in firepower, speed and armor on paper. Her major deficiency was crew experience. Bismarck’s crew was well trained for ship on ship engagements in the protected baltic while Hood’s long service prewar crew had been dispersed to new construction and her current crew had combat experience but not in battleship on battleship combat, World War II era battleships were egg shells swinging hammers at each other. Their guns far outclassed their armor and whoever got the first hit had a tremendous advantage for the rest of the engagement.”
An eyewitness sketch of HMS Hood exploding, prepared for the 2nd Board of Enquiry into her loss (1941)
Lastly, a small example of ship armor:

Percentages of battleships overall weight:

  • Hood – armor 32%, hull & machinery 51%
  • Rodney – armor 29%, hull & machinery 48%
  • KGV – armor 30%, hull & machinery 39%
  • Vanguard – armor 29%, hull & machinery 42%

Historian Harry Gillespie : Collected Works

Harry Gillespie is a writer who resides in the UK with his family. His work focuses on Naval & British history with a specific look at 20th century warfare and ships. From World War 1 to The Falkland Islands Campaign.

Huge thanks to Won-hui Lee for the cover image! Ship (Finished), 워니’s Dio.. : 네이버블로그 (naver.com)

SAS Raid On Pebble Island 1982

IJN Kongo

What Was Force Z in WW2? & Why Was HMS Electra So Spectacular?

The Assault On Mount Kent

HMS Valiant & Her WW2 Career

Battle of Taranto : The Battle that Changed Warfare

HMS Dragon : A 3 War Ship

USS Nautilus : World’s First Nuclear Power Submarine

Britain’s Greatest Secret Raid Of WW2 : Royal Navy’s Operation Chariot

USS Enterprise

HMS Illustrious : World War 2’s Never Say Die Carrier

SAS Battle Of Mount Kent : Special Air Service & The Falklands War

What happened to the French aircraft carrier in ww2?

HMS Durban

Operation Rheinubung : Bismarck’s Last & Only Mission

What Was Wrong With Italian Battleship Guns? They Had The Potential For Greatness!

USS Phoenix : A History Compiled

What Sank The Belgrano? ARA General Belgrano (C-4) was an Argentine Navy light cruiser in service from 1951 until 1982.

HMS Whitehall : A History Compiled

German Battleship Scharnhorst : Better Than Bismarck

The Italian Cruiser Trieste

USS Washington (BB-56)

Scharnhorst and Gneisenau : Germany’s Raiders of World War 2

The Panzerschiff Admiral Graf Spee German Cruiser AKA “Pocket Battleship” & WW2

Battle of Cape Matapan 1941 : Italy’s Greatest Naval Defeat

HMS Royal Oak’s Sinking At Scapa Flow By U-47 HMS Victorious During Operation Pedestal

RMS Carmania & SMS Cap Trafalgar : The World’s First Battle Between Former Ocean Liners

Italian Submarine Leonardo Da Vinci : The Most Successful Non-German Submarine In The Atlantic Theater of WW2

The 2nd Bismarck Sinking Of WW2

Prinz Eugen & Her Active WW2 Career

HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney : The Last Torpedo Battleships

HMS Warspite & the Second Battle of Narvik

The Altmark Incident

Battleships / World War 2

Dispelling the Myth of the “Under Armored Battlecruiser HMS Hood”.